Proposition: Although there is no reported case on the subject, there is no reason in principle why trees which interfere with an established right to light of a building to a sufficient extent should not give rise to a right of action by the person entitled to the right, whether the trees in question are […]
Proposition: Where, for the purposes of s.3 of the Prescription Act 1832, a right to light is enjoyed by the dominant tenement as a result of a consent or agreement in writing made or given by the owner of the servient tenement, it is likely that, in the majority of cases, a successor in title […]
Proposition: An owner of a building with roof top solar panels cannot acquire a prescriptive right to the access of the sun’s rays.
Recent Comments